Advertising

Big and Long BBC Pissing

Thank you for your vote!
0%
Rates : 0
4 months ago9109 Views
Categories:

Big and Long BBC Pissing is a sex story about bbc  pissing on the sofa while watching an erotic movie! I love it. It’s sexy piss  and I love it when I’m horny and I have some time on my hands and I need to pee. I love peeing in my pants cock  or the pants and panties. But when I’m pissing I want to pee on my bed or my couch or my bed. And I’ve got some really dirty things for this to pee on big  and long. I’ve got pee on my couch, the couch, my butt, my dick, my butt cheeks, my cock, my butt cheeks, my cock head, my crotch, my dick, my balls, my cock butt, my bigandlong  pissing penis, and my bigandlong pissing pussy. I also pee on all my clothes that have a pissing effect on them and I pee on everything from underwear to my butt-cheeks. I’ve even got pee in my mouth.
Posted by The Man at 4 pissing  and I at 1:26<|endoftext|>In a major win for women’s rights in Pakistan, the Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment, has struck down Section 377 of the criminal code, saying it violates women’s rights.

Section 377 of the country’s criminal penal code makes any consensual sex between a married man and a woman punishable with death huge  and long.

The ruling came after a petition by two women, who claimed the punishment was disproportionate.

“A man is allowed to pee on his wife and if he has an orgasm on that woman’s body, he is supposed to pay her a dowry. But if her body becomes dirty, there would be severe consequences, like imprisonment for life,” they wrote in the petition monster  of a case.

In the ruling, the court said it could not accept the woman’s argument that it was punishment for adultery because “it is not a crime to have an orgasm on a woman who is pregnant.”

“I am a bit surprised because I thought the offence would be for sexual intercourse with the woman’s pregnant body.”

But the court found that the punishment was disproportionate – in particular for rape and sexual assault massive  and long. And that was where the real problem for the petitioner women’s rights activist and lawyer was: that “there was no provision at any stage for punishment for anal rape. No provision was made in terms of the punishment for rape or rape by penetration or even with a stick.”

The Court said:

I cannot accept [the argument that the woman] did not give her consent. I can accept her submission that she did not give any consent but the offence that is inflicted giant  and long is sexual intercourse by penetration, not a rape, and not a sexual intercourse by force with the woman’s pregnant body.

So in other words, if she was a virgin, her husband would be punished but if he had had sex with her, he would not be punished.

“That was clearly an insult to a virgin. She said her husband raped her on a daily basis. She was not only being raped but he was also raping her every day,” says one of the petitioners, Dr. Aasia,